|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Wed, 21st Apr 2021 1:25:00 |
|
Climate change: Growing doubts over chip fat biofuel |
New research questions the environmental impact of rising imports of used cooking oil (UCO) into the UK and Europe.
Chip fat and other oils are considered waste, so when they are used to make biodiesel it saves carbon emissions by displacing fossil oil.
But such is the demand across Europe that imports now account for more than half of the UCO that's made into fuel.
According to the study, there's no way to prove these imports are sustainable.
With no testing of what's coming in, experts believe it is also ripe for fraud.
Reducing emissions from transport is proving to be one of the toughest challenges for governments all over the world.
They've encouraged the use of biofuels as an important means of curbing carbon from cars and lorries.
Biofuels are normally a blend of fossil fuel and oil made from plants or vegetables.
The fact that these crops can be re-grown and soak up more CO2 means they cancel out the carbon emitted when used in engines.
Soy and palm oil were once widely used as components of biodiesel but this practice has been widely discredited because it encourages deforestation.
So for the last decade or so, the use of used cooking oil has expanded massively as an alternative feedstock for fuel.
Chip fat and other waste oils have become a key component of biodiesel with an effective industry springing up across Europe to collect and process the product.
But with the amount of biodiesel made from UCO increasing by around 40% every year since 2014, there simply isn't enough chip fat to go around.
According to a report from the campaign group Transport & Environment, more than half of the UCO used in Europe is imported.
Their study suggests this is highly problematic when it comes to impacts on the environment.
While UCO is considered a waste material in the UK, in China, Indonesia and Malaysia it has long been used to feed animals. The report raises the question of what people in these countries are replacing the UCO with, when it is exported.
In 2019, Malaysia exported 90 million litres of UCO to the UK and Ireland. Figures for their exports to other European countries aren't available but the flow of UCO is likely to be similar.
With a population of around 33 million, that's close to three litres per head of used oil that's collected and exported to the UK and Ireland alone.
By comparison, Thailand, which has a population of 70 million people, managed to collect around five million litres of UCO in 2019.
"Because we are buying it, they have less used cooking oil to use on the things that they were previously using it for," said Greg Archer with Transport & Environment.
"And they're just buying more virgin oil and that virgin oil is largely palm oil, because that's the cheapest oil available.
"So indirectly, we're just encouraging more deforestation in Southeast Asia."
Another major problem with UCO is the suspicion of fraud.
Because of demand from Europe, the price of UCO is often higher than palm oil. The worry is that some unscrupulous traders are simply diluting shipments of UCO with palm.
As oils of different types are mixed in bulk for transport, and no testing of the materials is carried out, some experts believe fraud is rife.
Read original full article
|
| |
|
|
Back to Featured Articles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy News
|
|
| |
| |
